Select Page
Prelude 9/11 morning Flight 11 hijacked Flight 175 hijacked WTC 1 hit Flight 77 hijacked WTC 2 hit Flight 93 hijacked Pentagon hit WTC 2 collapses Flight 93 crashes WTC 1 collapses WTC 7 collapses Epilogue

Hvordan bruges 911facts.dk?


Hvordan får du mest ud af denne site?

Using 911facts.dk


How do you get the most of out this site?


Ny bog på dansk

KONSPIRATIONS-
TEORETIKERE
– TYPER, TRIN, TERROR


HVORFOR bliver folk konspirationsteoretikere?
HVORFOR er konspirations-
teoretikere så frustrerende at tale med?
HVORFOR er konspirations-
teoretikeres adfærd så ekstrem?

Disse spørgsmål bliver besvaret i denne bog, der samtidig klarlægger, hvorfor de gængse tiltag overfor konspirations-
teoretikere ikke virker.
Læs mere


Truth Movement

Sandhedsbevægelsen


Publications


Booking


We are available for booking a lecture or a workshop here.

Booking


Er du interesseret i at booke os til foredrag eller workshop, så kan du gøre det her.


Facebook


Privatlivspolitik


Læs om vores privatlivspolitik.

Index

SkeptiCamp Monterey 2022

Facepalm – the absurdities of the Truth MovementConspiracy theorists present their alternative explanations as far better supported than “the official accounts”. In reality, the theories are not only lacking in evidence, they are also absurd and often contradict each...

SkeptiCamp Monterey 2022

Facepalm – the absurdities of the Truth MovementKonspirationsteoretikere præsenterer deres alternative forklaringer som langt bedre understøttede end "de officielle forklaringer". I virkeligheden mangler teorierne ikke kun beviser, de er også absurde og modsiger ofte...

Ingen spor af Flight 93

Denne påstand er fremsat på 911facts.dk’s Facebook-debat side 15. maj 2021 af brugeren Matthew Maguire, som ifølge sine oplysninger på Facebook også kaldes ”Last Prophet”, bor i Caseyville, Illinois, USA og har studeret på St. Matthew High School i Ottawa, Canada og arbejder som ”Jesus Christ”.

No trace of Flight 93

Claim There is absolutely no evidence of a plane crash at the Pennsylvania location. Background This claim was made on 911facts.dk's Facebook debate page on 15 May 2021 by the user Matthew Maguire, who, according to his information on Facebook, also calls himself...

Analyse af Tom Hosey interview

Baggrund En betragtelig del af Sandhedsbevægelsens argumentation for, at den officielle forklaring er en løgn, og at hemmelige bagmænd i stedet stod bag terrorangrebet den 11. september 2001, består af vidneudsagn, typisk interviews, med mennesker, der enten har hørt...

Transcript of debate on September 22, 2012

Between Niels Harrit from the Danish Truth Movement, and Steen Svanholm and Claus Larsen from 911facts.dk on Danish Radio24syv. The interview (in Danish) can be found here. (Weather forecast from 0:00 to 00:20.) Host: Welcome to "Aflyttet" ("Bugged"), the program that...

The official account is a conspiracy theory

Claim The official account is a conspiracy theory0. Background The story about the 19 terrorists from al Qaeda, who hijacked four planes and where three succeeded in hitting three of their intented targets, is considered a much less credible explanation than the main...

The Manhattan Project

Background One of the most central claims from the Truth Movement is that the New World Order wanted to create a situation by faking a terror attack on September 11, 2001 where the population became so terrorized that it would accept restrictions in civil rights and...

Løbeseddel i11time, 28/10-2010, modsvar

Her kan læseren finde modsvar til hver enkelt påstand fremsat i løbesedlen 28/01-2010, udgivet af i11time.dk Symmetrisk kollaps i frit fald som et korthus. Modsvar Frit fald og symmetrisk kollaps Pludseligt begyndende kollaps. Modsvar Pludseligt kollaps Enorme...

Løbeseddel i11time, 28/01-2010

Baggrund Denne løbeseddel 0 er fra den 28. januar 2010, og lagt ud til medlemmerne af den danske afdeling af Sandhedsbevægelsen, i11time, til fri afbenyttelse, til opslagstavler, og fordeling i bl.a. opgange og postkasser 1. Tilsvarende løbesedler med lidt varierende...

Løbeseddel i11time, 11/09-2009, modsvar

Her kan læseren finde modsvar til hver enkelt påstand fremsat i løbesedlen 11/09-2009, udgivet af i11time.dk Kollaps i frit fald, symmetrisk lige ned gennem bygningens egenmodstand. Modsvar Frit fald og symmetrisk kollaps Pludseligt og voldsomt opstart af kollaps....

Løbeseddel i11time, 11/09-2009

Baggrund Denne løbeseddel blev delt ud af den danske afdeling af Sandhedsbevægelsen, i11time, til deres demonstration på Rådhuspladsen den 11. september 2009. Tilsvarende løbesedler med lidt varierende tekst deles fortsat ud til lignende demonstrationer, foredrag og...

Er Sandhedsbevægelsens mål at få svar på spørgsmål?

Baggrund Sandhedsbevægelsen har til formål at gennemtvinge en såkaldt “ny, uvildig undersøgelse” af terrorangrebet den 11. september 2001. Bevægelsen mener overordnet, at det ikke var al Qaeda, der stod bag angrebet, men at de virkelige skyldige er blandt andre USA’s...

Er Sandhedsbevægelsen blot et plagiat af en Hollywood film?

Baggrund Oliver Stones film “JFK” fra 1991 omhandler den påståede konspiration, der lå bag attentatet på John F. Kennedy den 22. november, 1963. I filmen er helten statsanklager Jim Garrison, der med sit lille team af frygtløse ansatte kaster sig ud i en kamp mod...

Afgørelse i stævningen mod Thomas Nørgaard

Redaktionen blev den 6. december 2015 af Thomas Nørgaard, gymnasielærer på Ørestad Gymnasium, gjort opmærksom på, at der forefandtes to artikler fra 911facts.dk på en anden hjemmeside. Artiklerne var kopieret af Thomas Nørgaard selv og var forsynet med hans egne kommentarer.

Afgørelse i retssagen mod Jesper Larsen

Redaktionen blev den 5. og 6. juni 2016 af Thomas Nørgaard, gymnasielærer på Ørestad Gymnasium, gjort opmærksom på, at der forefandtes to artikler fra 911facts.dk på en anden hjemmeside. Da redaktionen ikke havde givet tilladelse til kopiering af artiklerne, lagde redaktionen sag an om krænkelse af ophavsret mod ejeren af hjemmesiden, Jesper Larsen.

Afgørelse i klagen til DR af Jeppe Severin

Den 4. august 2011 klagede Jeppe Severin, talsmand for den danske afdeling af Sandhedsbevægelsen, over redaktørerne af denne hjemmeside, som den 3. august 2011 deltog i radioprogrammet P1 Morgen, hvor de fortalte om åbningen af hjemmesiden.

The media knew WTC 7 would collapse

Claim “How Did The BBC Know About WTC7’s Collapse 23 Minutes Before It Happened?”0 og: “How could the media report about WTC 7 before it collapsed?”1 Background http://www.youtube.com/embed/WHzbVkao8ZY The claim, in the form of a question, is used to argue that the...

Medierne vidste at WTC 7 ville kollapse

Påstand “How Did The BBC Know About WTC7’s Collapse 23 Minutes Before It Happened?”0 og: “Hvordan kunne medier berette om WTC7 før det kollapsede?”1 Baggrund http://www.youtube.com/embed/WHzbVkao8ZY Påstanden, som ganske vist er formuleret som et spørgsmål, bruges til...

The audio file with Betty Ong has been edited

Claim The claim was made by Thomas Nørgaard, physics teacher at Nørre Gymnasium, Copenhagen, on July 26 2017 on 911facts.dk's Facebook wall:1 Dear 911facts This is a claim I would like you to investigate for me. Thanks. The publically accessible audio file of Betty...

Løbeseddel i11time, 01/09-2009

Baggrund Denne løbeseddel 0 er fra den 1. september 2009, og lagt ud til medlemmerne af den danske afdeling af Sandhedsbevægelsen, i11time, til fri afbenyttelse, til opslagstavler, og fordeling i bl.a. opgange og postkasser. 0. Tilsvarende løbesedler med lidt...

Lydfilen med Betty Ong er redigeret

Påstanden er fremsat på 911facts.dk’s Facebook-debatside den 26. juli 2017 af Thomas Nørgaard, fysiklærer ved Ørestad Gymnasium, København. Påstanden bruges til at underbygge påstanden om, at Flight 11 ikke var kapret, hvorfor i hvert fald den del af de officielle undersøgelser derfor må være forkerte.

How to “expose a cover-up”

Despite innumerable claims of solid evidence of the existence of the New World Order, it always turns out that the evidence is of more or less doubtful nature. One such example is this “exposure” from June 13, 2011, published on the blog Truth-out.org 0: The main...

Radio 24 syv, Again with Jeppesen

Again with Jeppesen 16. januar 2015 Je suis Mossad – today we will talk about why there was no blood when the police officer fell to the ground in front of Hebdo (and a little bit about 9/11). The theme is conspiracy theories. -Michael Jeppesen. (The radio show is in...

How much support does the Truth Movement have?

It is inherently difficult to establish precisly how much public support exists for the Truth Movement. Polls can give some indication of a mood in the population but the polls that are used by the Truth Movement (and usually paid by same) rarely says anything about...

The official account is self-contradicting

Claim Proponents of the official account claim on one hand that it required a lot of explosives to get the World Trade Center 1 and 2 to collapse and on the other that the collapse could only happen due to the plane impacts.0 Background The claim was made by Brian...

100 tons, that’s quite a lot, isn’t it?

On March 3, 2015, 911facts.dk interviewed physicist Per Hedegaard about his involvement in the court case filed by Niels Harrit against Danish newspaper Weekendavisen. A U.S. website had claimed that Per Hedegaard had changed his mind and would testify in support of...

Debate-lecture with Jeppe Severin

On November 26, 2012, we held a debate with Jeppe Severin who represented the Truth Movement’s demand for a so-called new independent investigation of the terror attack on September 11, 2001. The debate took place at Kulturhuset Indre By in Copenhagen. The debate...

Debate-lecture with Niels Harrit

On October 19, 2011, we held a debate with retired chemistry professor Niels Harrit at the local cultural center, Prismen, Copenhagen, Denmark. The lecture was recorded by both our camera crew and Niels Harrit’s camera crew.We would love to bring the lecture in its...

Banking ‘reforms’ are coming…

Baggrund Denne løbeseddel blev delt ud af den danske afdeling af Sandhedsbevægelsen, i11time, ved deres demonstration på Rådhuspladsen den 11. september 2009. Løbesedlen deles forsat ud til lignende demonstrationer, foredrag og andre arrangementer. Løbesedlen er her...

Analysis: "The Official Video: ReThink911 September 2013"

In July 2013 the umbrella organization ReThink911.org0 which comprises a number of groups within the Truth Movement a video asking for financial support for an information campaign. The goal is to get the public to realize that the official explanation of the terror...

4.000 israelere mødte ikke op på arbejde

Denne påstand tager udgangspunkt i myten om, at jøder er og har været indblandet i de største konspirationer gennem tiderne. Når så mange jøder ikke møder op, er det, fordi de er blevet advaret på forhånd modsat ikke-jøder, der så er blevet ofre for terrorhandlingen.

We are just asking questions

Those who believe that the terror attack on September 11, 2001, in reality was planned by a conspiracy within the American government often defend themselves with the phrase “we are only asking questions”, thus indicating innocence, healthy skepticism and an excuse from coming up with plausible counter-explanations. However, asking a question without explaining yourself is often in itself an indirect claim, since a question can be subjectively related to the topic and the context in which the question is asked. This is precisely the technique that the conspiracy theorists use.

Flight 93 was shot down

The claim that Flight 93 was shot down is based on debris from the plane being found up to 12 kilometers from the crash site. One piece of debris was a plane engine, weighing a ton, about 800 meters from the crash site. The claim is supported with the argument that the crash site does not look like a plane crash site. There are too few and too small pieces of debris. For comparison, other, even violent, crash sites are used, where easily recognizable plane parts were found.

Steel sections fly horizontally with more than 180 km/h

It is claimed that the World Trade Center 1 and 2 didn’t collapse due to fires and structural damages from the impacts of the hijacked passenger planes. Instead, explosives were placed in the buildings and later detonated, causing them to collapse. Steel sections, weighing many tons, being ejected with enormous force from the buildings should thus be evidence of how powerful these explosives were.

Highrises on fire have never collapsed

The claim posits that it is suspicious that the World Trade Center 1, 2 and 7 collapsed, since it would be the first time that steel-framed highrises collapsed due to fire. It is thus argued that a conspiracy consisting of the american government was behind the attack and not, as previously established, Osama bin Laden, al Qaeda, and the 19 terrorists.

Signs of explosives in FEMA report

The claim refers to a report by FEMA. The scope of the terror attack resulted in FEMA being tasked to conduct a number of investigations of the events on September 11, 2001. The results of these investigations were published in a report in May 2002. It is claimed that the FEMA report’s steel analyses show sulfidation, oxidation, and intergranular melting, which are signs of explosives.

World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7 fell in their own footprints

Niels Harrit, a Danish retired chemistry professor, hints in his lecture about the terror attack on September 11, 2001, that the buildings ought to have toppled like certain buildings have done after their foundations had been damaged due to e.g. earthquakes or mudslides. His argument for an alternative explanation is that, since the World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7’s foundations were not damaged, it must be evidence that the official account is false.

Maintenance workers placed explosives in the Twin Towers

A number of companies, among them Ace Elevators and Turner Construction, that were doing maintenance work on elevators at the World Trade Center 1 and 2 in the days before September 11, 2001 should ostensibly have been involved with placing explosives on all floors in the buildings, either by placing the explosives themselves or as a cover for someone else placing it.

Osama bin Laden’s confession videos are faked

The Truth Movement claims that those proclamations where Osama bin Laden admits responsibility on behalf of his organization are faked. A video that appeared in December 2001 is pointed out as perhaps the most obvious evidence of a hoax.

One of the passengers saw a gun

The claim indicates that the official account is false since that states that the terrorists used box cutters. The official account should thus seek to conceal that it wasn’t untrained al Qaeda terrorists but instead trained people who were hijacking the plane.

Poul Nyrup Rasmussen knew it would happen

The claim refers to a documentary on the Danish National Broadcasting Company, channel DR2, where Poul Nyrup Rasmussen, who was Prime Minister of Denmark on September 11, 2001, should have stated that he knew that the first tower would collapse before it happened. The claim is used to support the conspiracy theory that powerful people knew in advance that the terror attack on September 11, 2001, would happen, and that the World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7 would collapse, because there had supposedly been placed many tons of nanothermite and explosives in the buildings.

Volcanic-like dust clouds

The claim could mean that the dust clouds from the collapsing World Trade Center are evidence that the buildings were brought down by explosives. The claim could also mean that the dust clouds were so hot that they were pyroclastic clouds.

The asbestos dust from Ground Zero was declared safe

The claim insinuates that someone is trying to hide that the buildings contained so much asbestos that the cost of removing it would exceed the value of the buildings. It was therefore decided to blow up the buildings and later cover up the subsequent health risks.

Analysis of a petition: Avaaz.org

This article takes a closer look at one of the numerous petitions started by the Truth Movement following the terror attack on September 11, 2001. The object is to ensure what the movement calls an “independent investigation” of the events on that day.

The report about the towers does not include the collapse

The claim was made by the Danish chemistry professor emeritus Niels Harrit during the radio show DR Detektor on the Danish Broadcasting Corporation on March 9, 2011. Niels Harrit claimed that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has not included the collapses of the World Trade Center 1 and 2. Niels Harrit also claimed on the show that the buildings were destroyed by explosives. Niels Harrit repeated the claim on the radio show Wiretapped on the Danish radio station Radio 24syv. The claim is used to demand a new investigation of the events on September 11, 2001.

The passport in the ruins

A passport, belonging to Satam al-Suqami, one of the terrorists on bord Flight 11, was found moments before the World Trade Center 2 (South Tower) collapsed and given to a detective from the NYPD. The passport must therefore be planted.

Impossible to identify the terrorists from DNA

Allegedly, it should be implausible that any human tissue or bone material would survive the massive destruction. It would also be impossible to compare surviving DNA with DNA from the terrorists, since they had not given DNA samples to the authorities before the terror attack. Furthermore, the claim suggests that there weren’t any hijackers on board the four planes, which means that the planes must have been remotely controlled or that the planes must have been flown into their targets by the airline pilots.

Stock exchange speculation

The claim is used to support the overall claim by conspiracy theorists of a world-wide secret organization which not only plans and carries out terror attacks and wars but also profits from them.

Danish physicist supports Niels Harrit

In the time leading up to Niels Harrit’s libel trial in the High Court, a claim emerged that the former colleague of Harrit’s, physicist Per Hedegaard, had changed his mind from thinking that Niels Harrit’s theories were “crazy” to supporting Niels Harrit.

No photos of Osama bin Laden’s body

The claim is used to support the conspiracy theory that Osama bin Laden was not behind the terror attack on September 11, 2001. Instead, it is claimed that Osama bin Laden died at an earlier time, in December 2001, which means that he could not have been killed by U.S. special forces on May 2nd, 2011.

Flight 175 could not fly 950 km/h

The claim is based on the assumption that Flight 175, a Boeing 767-222, was not designed to fly as fast as it did, when it hit the World Trade Center 2. Additionally, it was not possible to control the plane, so that it could hit the building. Thus, it cannot be Flight 175 that hit the World Trade Center 2.

Larry Silverstein committed insurance fraud

Larry Silverstein leased and insured against terror attacks from planes in the weeks before 9/11. Thus, he ordered that the World Trade Center 7 should be blown up so that he could make money from insurance fraud. The insurance sum is claimed to be $5.4 billion.

Heavy rain points to nano-thermite

The claim, made by e.g. Niels Harrit, is used to support a central claim, namely that huge quantities of explosives and top secret military-developed nanothermite were placed in the World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7 prior to September 11, 2001. Allegedly, the nanothermite melted the metal in the buildings leaving lakes of melted metal on Ground Zero where the buildings collapsed. The claim suggests that the amounts of melted metal were so large that even heavy rain could not cool them down. It is suggested that something caused this heat to last and that this could only be nanothermite.

The top of the World Trade Center 1 was destroyed before the collapse

The claim is used to support the overall claim that the Twin Towers did not collapse as described in the official reports, namely due to the damages from the planes and the subsequent large fires that could not be fought. Instead, the Twin Towers were allegedly destroyed by huge quantities of explosives and top secret military-developed nanothermite which were placed in the World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7 prior to September 11, 2001. When the nanothermite (and explosives) were ignited, the three buildings then collapsed.

Osama bin Laden was not wanted by the FBI for 9/11

The claim circulated primarily among conspiracy theorists prior to the liquidation of Osama bin Laden on May 2nd, 2011, by American elite forces. It was argued that, since the FBI did not specifically write on the warrant that Osama bin Laden was wanted for the terror attack on September 11, 2001, it must mean that Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with the attack.

CIA ordered visas for 15 of the hijackers

J. Michael Springman is a former employee at the American Consulate in Jeddah, Saudi-Arabia. During an interview with radio host Alex Jones, he claimed that, despite him refusing to grant 15 of the 19 hijackers visas for the United States, because they were on a watchlist, the CIA ordered him to grant the visas anyway.

Passenger manifests are not evidence of the persons having been on board

Jeppe Severin, representative and spokesperson for the Danish Truth Movement, claims that there is no evidence that Mohammed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, and Hani Hanjour, who the forensic investigation named as three of the suicide pilots, were on the three planes Flight 11, Flight 175, and Flight 77. Since those three terrorists from al Qaeda appeared on the passenger manifests for the three planes, it must mean that passenger manifests are not evidence that the persons have been on board.

The third explosion brought down the tower

The claim stems from a Youtube clip of a live television broadcast from the American WCBS. Thomas Torrent from the Danish Truth Movement published on July 19th, 2012 a link to the clip with the headline “The third explosion brought down the tower”. The clip was not accompanied with any comment.

Flight 93 was abducted

The claim is based on a brief article from September 11, 2001 published around noon, local time. The mayor of Cleveland, Ohio, Michael R. White, was quoted saying that a Boeing 767 from Boston had made an emergency landing in Cleveland Hopkins International Airport because it was believed there was a bomb on board.

It is possible to smuggle explosives through security

An article in The Washington Post describes how, in 2009, American security agents from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) succeeded in smuggling materials for small bombs through security in ten important government buildings. The agents then put together the small bombs and walked around with them, unhindered. The article is used by the Truth Movement to support the claim that, leading up to September 11, 2001, huge quantities of explosives and top secret military-developed nanothermite were placed in the World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7. It is argued that, since agents in secret can smuggle materials for explosives into federal buildings, there is nothing that prevents the World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7 from being destroyed by controlled demolitions.

Black boxes found at the World Trade Center

Two rescue workers in the so-called TRAC-team (Trauma Response Assistance for Children), Nicholas DeMasi and Mike Bellone, claim that they helped FBI agents find and salvage three of the four black boxes from the planes that hit the World Trade Center 1 and 2. It is claimed that the FBI later left with the boxes. The boxes were supposedly found on October 3, 2001.

Flight 77’s route was suspicious

The claim is used to support the claim that Flight 77 was not flown by one of the hijackers, Hani Hanjour, because the maneuver was supposedly too complicated for an untrained pilot. The claim is thus used to support the claim that Flight 77 was remotely controlled, which again should point to someone other than al Qaeda being involved in the terror attack on September 11, 2001. Instead, the attack was a so-called “inside job”. The claim leads to yet another claim: That it wasn’t even Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon but a Global Hawk drone.

There were two planes, but three buildings that collapsed

The claim is used to support the claim that the Twin Towers did not collapse due to the damage caused by the planes, and the subsequent planes, and furthermore, that the collapse of the towers showed clear signs of controlled demolitions, where demolition experts have placed explosives strategically in the buildings’ structure. At a certain time, the explosives are detonated, destroying the buildings, with as little damage to the surrounding buildings as possible.

No plane hit the Pentagon

The claim points to something else than Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, which would mean that the terror attack was not carried out by Islamic terrorists.

Bush ignored warnings about an attack

The many warnings should have been ignored deliberately by the American govenment, because it wanted to pass legislation that removed civil rights, so that the overall plan for the New World Order could be implemented more easily.

The hijacked planes could have been intercepted by military planes

In 1999, Air Traffic Control lost contact with a Learjet 35 on its way from Orlando, Florida, to Dallas, Texas. On board were two pilots and four passengers, one being the famous golf player Payne Stewart. An F-16 from Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, which happened to be in the area, was dispatched to localize the plane but was unable to make contact. Two more planes were dispatched, also to make contact, but this was also in vain. The Learjet continued its course until it ran out of fuel, after which it crashed. This incident is used to argue that the hijacked planes on September 11, 2001 were intentionally not intercepted by military planes.

Dancing Israelis knew the terror attack would happen

Five men, with Middle Eastern looks, were seen cheering on top of a truck while they were filming the terror attack. The men were arrested but later released from custody. When interviewed on Israeli television, they said that they were only there to film the event. The claim is used to argue that the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, knew in advance that the terror attack would happen.

4,000 Israelis did not show up for work

This claim is rooted in the myth that Jews are, and have been, behind the largest conspiracies throughout time. When that many Jews don’t show up for work, it must be because they were warned beforehand, as opposed to non-Jews, who then became victims of the terror attack.

Jernholdige kugler kan kun skyldes termitreaktion

I Harrit et al. artikel ‘Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe’ foretager forskerne DSC-målinger. Restproduktet i kalorimeteret efter de rød/grå-chips har reageret, er bla. nogle mikroskopiske jernholdige kugler. Den hævdes, at den eneste fysiske/kemiske proces, der kan forklare dannelsen af disse jernholdige kugler, er en termitreaktion.

Plane engine is not from Flight 175

The prominent member of the Danish chapter of the Truth Movement, Jeppe Severin, concludes unambigously that the crashed engine on Murray Street is a Pratt & Wittney JT9D-7A -7F or -7J, and not a Pratt & Wittney JT9D-7RD4, which would normally be the one Flight 175 would be equipped with.

Flight 77 could not fly fast close to the ground

Due to the so-called ground effect, it should not be possible for a Boeing 757 to fly close to the ground at a speed of 500 mph (800 km/h). The consequence of the claim is thus that something other than Flight 77, a Boeing 757, hit the Pentagon after having flown the last part of the stretch at 529 mph (852 km/h) a few meters above the ground.

Osama bin Laden did not die on May 2, 2011

Some believe that Osama bin Laden is not dead at all, some believe that he died in December 2001 from a lung disease and lies buried in Afghanistan, some believe he is kept frozen somewhere in the United States.

100 tons, det er ret meget, ikke?

Den 3. marts 2015 interviewede 911facts.dk fysiker Per Hedegaard i anledning af, at han ifølge en amerikansk hjemmeside havde ændret holdning og tilsyneladende insisterede på at vidne i landsretten til fordel for Niels Harrit i dennes injuriesag mod Weekendavisen.

Dansk fysiker støtter Niels Harrit

I tiden op til at den danske pensionerede kemilektor Niels Harrit skulle prøve sin injuriesag i landsretten, opstod påstanden om, at Niels Harrits tidligere kollega, fysikeren Per Hedegaard, havde skiftet synspunkt fra at mene, at Niels Harrits teorier var ”gak” til nu at støtte Niels Harrit.

Rumsfeld admitted that the Pentagon was missing 2.3 trillion dollars

The claim supports the conspiracy theory that the terror attack against the Pentagon was supposedly a so-called false flag operation. Rumsfeld had knowledge that the terror attack would take place the next day, knowing that the news of the missing trillions would be buried in the massive media cover of the attack. The hijacked Flight 77 was intended to impact the Pentagon at the exact spot where the documents that would reveal the fraud would be. The impact and the subsequent damage and fires were then to destroy the evidence. The claim is also used to explain where the money to wage war in Iraq and Afghanistan came from.

Power cut concealed placement of explosives

The claim is taken from a flyer handed out by the Danish Truth Movement i11time.dk and points to a conspiracy having faked a widespread power cut in order to be able to send a lot of people into the buildings to place explosives without being caught.

Flight 77 kunne ikke flyve stærkt tæt på jorden

På grund af den såkaldte jordeffekt (ground effect), skulle det ikke være muligt for en Boeing 757 at flyve tæt ved jorden med en hastighed på 500 mph (ca. 800 km/t). Følgen af påstanden er dermed, at noget andet end Flight 77, som var en Boeing 757, ramte Pentagon, efter at have fløjet den sidste del af strækningen med 529 mph (852 km/t) få meter over jorden.

Interview med pilot og flyinstruktør Pierre Viby

Pierre Viby er pilot og flyinstruktør med erfaring i Boeing 767. Han er tilknyttet Center Air, pilotuddannelsen i Roskilde. 911facts.dk kontaktede Center Air3 i april 2013 og interviewede Pierre Viby, som er uddannelsesstedets mest vidende person om flyvning og undervisning i Boeing 767-fly.

USAs flåde lå ved Afghanistan

Den amerikanske flåde var placeret ved Afghanistan før den 11. september 2001. Derfor må den amerikanske regering have vidst, at noget var i gære.

CIA beordrede visa til 15 af kaprerne

J. Michael Springman er tidligere ansat i det amerikanske konsulat i Jeddah, Saudi-Arabien. I et interview med radioværten Alex Jones hævder han, at han nægtede at give 15 af de 19 flykaprere visum til USA, fordi de stod på en såkaldt “watchlist”, men at CIA beordrede ham til at give dem visa alligevel.

Passagerlister er ikke bevis på, at personerne har været ombord

Hvis der ikke er beviser for, at Mohammed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi og Hani Hanjour, som den kriminaltekniske efterforskning udpegede som tre af selvmordspiloterne, overhovedet er gået ombord i de tre fly, henholdsvis Flight 11, Flight 175 og Flight 77. Eftersom de tre terrorister fra al Qaeda optrådte på passagerlisterne for de pågældende fly, må det ifølge påstanden betyde, at passagerlister ikke er bevis på, at personerne har været ombord.

Flight 175 kunne ikke flyve 950 km/t

Påstanden lyder, at en standard Boeing 767 kan ikke flyve med 950 km/t tæt på havets overflade uden at blive revet i stykker. Det begrundes med, at Flight 175, et passagerfly af typen Boeing 767-222, ikke var designet til at kunne flyve så hurtigt, som det gjorde, da det ramte WTC 2. Desuden var det ikke muligt at styre flyet så præcist, at det kunne ramme WTC 2. Man konkluderer derfor, at det ikke var Flight 175, som ramte WTC 2.

Flymotor stammer ikke fra Flight 175

Da Flight 175 ramte WTC 2 fortsatte dele af flyet ud gennem bygningens modsatte side, herunder noget af den ene flymotor, som senere blev set og fotograferet på Murray Street, hvor den var landet. Det hævdes, at denne motordel ikke kan stamme fra Flight 175, fordi den tilsyneladende har nogle køledyser monteret, som ikke matcher med Flight 175’s motortype.

Osama bin Ladens tilståelsesvideoer er falske

I tiden efter terrorangrebet den 11. september 2001, udsendte al Qaeda en række proklamationer, enten i skreven form, som lydoptagelser eller videoer, hvor specielt Osama bin Laden gjorde rede for bl.a. al Qaedas grunde til at planlægge og udføre terrorangrebet. Sandhedsbevægelsen hævder, at de proklamationer, hvor Osama bin Laden indrømmer organisationens ansvar, er falske.

Toppen af World Trade Center 1 blev ødelagt før kollaps

Påstanden skulle underbygge den overordnede påstand om, at Twin Towers ikke kollapsede som beskrevet i de officielle rapporter som følgevirkning af de skader, flyene afstedkom, og de efterfølgende voldsomme brande, der ikke kunne bekæmpes. I stedet skulle Twin Towers være destrueret ved brug af enorme mængder sprængstof og tophemmeligt militært udviklet nanotermit.

Der er ikke fremlagt billeder af Osama bin Ladens lig

Påstanden skal underbygge konspirationsteorien om, at Osama bin Laden ikke stod bag terrorangrebet den 11. september 2001. I stedet postuleres det, at Osama bin Laden døde allerede i december 2001, hvorfor han så ikke kunne være dræbt af amerikanske elitestyrker den 2. maj, 2011.

Den tredje eksplosion bragte tårnet ned

Påstanden hidrører fra et Youtube-klip af en live tv-udsendelse fra det amerikanske tv-selskab WCBS. Den danske afdeling af Sandhedsbevægelsen ved Thomas Torrens, et fremtrædende medlem, har den 19. juli 2012 offentliggjort et link til Youtube-klippet under overskriften “Den tredje eksplosion bragte tårnet ned”. Klippet blev ikke ved offentliggørelsen fulgt af yderligere kommentarer.

Analyse af en underskriftindsamling: Avaaz.org

Denne artikel vil undersøge en af de talrige underskriftindsamlinger som Sandhedsbevægelsen siden terrorangrebet den 11. september 2001 har startet, i forsøg på at få hvad bevægelsen kalder en “uvildig undersøgelse” af begivenhederne den dag.

Det er muligt at smugle sprængstof gennem sikkerhedskontrollen

En artikel fra The Washington Post, der beskriver hvordan det i 2009 lykkedes amerikanske sikkerhedsagenter fra The Government Accountability Office (GAO) at snige materialer til små bomber forbi sikkerhedskontrollen i 10 vigtige regeringsbygninger, bruges af Sandhedsbevægelsen til at underbygge påstanden om, at der i tiden op til den 11. september 2001 blev anbragt store mængder sprængstof og tophemmeligt militært udviklet nanotermit i World Trade Center 1, 2 og 7. Argumentet lyder, at eftersom det er muligt for agenter i hemmelighed at smugle materialer til sprængstof ind i føderale bygninger, er der intet til hinder for, at World Trade Center 1, 2 og 7 blev destrueret ved kontrollerede sprængninger.

Den officielle forklaring er selvmodsigende

Fortalerne for den officielle forklaring hævder på den ene side, at det krævede meget sprængstof for at få World Trade Center 1 og 2 til at kollapse og på den anden side, at kollapset kunne opstå alene på grund af flyenes kollision.

Hvor stor opbakning har Sandhedsbevægelsen?

Det er notorisk svært at foretage præcise beregninger af, hvor bred en støtte Sandhedsbevægelsen har i befolkningen. Meningsmålinger kan give en indikation af en stemning i befolkningen, men de målinger der oftest henvises til i Sandhedsbevægelsen (og som regel er betalt af samme), siger sjældent noget om en direkte støtte til Sandhedsbevægelsens krav. Den reelle støtte må derfor regnes blandt de faktiske medlemmer af de forskellige interessegrupper. Her viser tallene en yderst begrænset støtte i befolkningen.

Flight 77 fløj en mistænkelig rute

Påstanden bruges til at argumentere for, at Flight 77 ikke blev fløjet af en af kaprerne, Hani Hanjour, fordi manøvren skulle være for vanskelig til, at utrænede piloter kan udføre den. Dermed bruges påstanden som argument for, at flyet var fjernstyret, hvilket igen skulle pege på, at der ikke var nogen al Qaeda-folk involveret i terrorangrebet den 11. september 2001, men at begivenheden var et såkaldt inside job.

Voldsom regn tyder på nanotermit

Påstanden, der blandt andet er fremsat af Niels Harrit, bruges til at underbygge en anden påstand, at der skulle have været store mængder af smeltet metal (stål, jern) i ruinerne på Ground Zero. Dette smeltede metal kunne, ifølge Sandhedsbevægelsen, kun komme fra mange tons nanotermit placeret i World Trade Center 1, 2 og 7 i tiden inden angrebet.

Manhattanprojektet

En af de mest centrale påstande i Sandhedsbevægelsen er, at New World Order med terrorangrebet den 11. september 2001 ville skabe en situation, hvor befolkningen blev skræmt til at acceptere indskrænkninger i borgerrettigheder, og at landet gik i krig. Manhattanprojektet bliver fremhævet som eksempel på, at store “konspirationer” godt kan holdes hemmelige.

Asbeststøvet fra Ground Zero blev erklæret ufarligt

Påstanden insinuerer, at man prøver at dække over, at bygningerne indeholdt så meget asbest, at omkostningerne ved at fjerne det ville overstige bygningernes værdi. Derfor valgte man at sprænge dem og senere dække over de helbredsrisici, der fulgte. En anden variant af påstanden hævder, at man ved at sende en masse asbest og andre farlige stoffer ud over New York og omegn ville skabe en krisesituation, der varede i årtier fremover.

Anonym general mener, at terrorangrebet var et “inside job”

Påstanden stammer fra den amerikanske radiovært og toneangivende frontløber i Sandhedsbevægelsen Alex Jones’ radioprogram den 3. maj 2011, hvor den blev fremsat af Steve Pieczenik, tidligere ansat i det amerikanske udenrigsministerium, debattør, konsulent og forfatter af blandt andet skønlitterære romaner og selvhjælpsbøger.

Sådan plantes en “afsløring”

På trods af utallige påstande om graverende beviser på New World Order, viser det sig altid, at beviserne er af mere eller mindre tvivlsom karakter. Et eksempel er denne “afsløring” fra 13. juni 2011 offentliggjort i blog’en Truth-out.org.

Den officielle forklaring er en konspirationsteori

Den officielle forklaring om de 19 terrorister fra al-Qaeda, der gennemførte terrorangrebet den 11. september 2001, anses af Sandhedsbevægelsen for at være en langt mindre troværdig forklaring end, at det i virkeligheden var en hemmelig operation, der skulle sikre de sande konspiratorer verdensmagten.

Osama bin Laden døde ikke den 2. maj 2011

Den 2. maj 2011 meddelte USAs præsident Barack Obama fra Det Hvide Hus, at Osama bin Laden var blevet dræbt under en aktion i Pakistan. Konspirationsteoretikere hævder dog, at dette ikke er sandt.

Rapporten om tårnene omfatter slet ikke kollapset

Påstanden er fremsat af den danske pensionerede kemilektor Niels Harrit i radioprogrammet DR Detektor den 9. marts 2011, og han hævder dermed, at National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) ikke har beskrevet kollapsene af World Trade Center 1 og 2, som ifølge Niels Harrit i samme udsendelse skulle være mineret med sprængstof. Påstanden anvendes endvidere til at kræve en ny undersøgelse af begivenhederne den 11. september 2001.

Rumsfeld indrømmede, at Pentagon manglede 2,3 trillioner dollar

Påstanden handler om, at terrorangrebet mod Pentagon skulle være en såkaldt false flag-operation. Rumsfeld havde kendskab til, at terrorangrebet ville finde sted næste dag og vidste, at oplysningen om de manglende trillioner dollars ville drukne i nyhedsstrømmen. Påstanden bruges også til at forklare, hvor pengene til den senere krigsførelse i Irak og Afghanistan kom fra.

Der var intet fly ved Pentagon

Påstanden antyder, at det var noget andet, der ramte Pentagon. Deraf følger, at angrebet ikke var udført af islamistiske terrorister. Det varierer, hvad det så var, der ramte bygningen, men nogle af de hyppigst fremsatte teorier er, at det var en bombe, der blev sprængt indefra, eller at det var et missil, typisk fremført af en Global Hawk-drone, der blev fjernstyret langt væk fra Pentagon. I påstanden indgår også, at vragresterne ved Pentagon ikke skulle stamme fra et Boeing 757-fly.

Tegn på sprængstof i FEMA-rapport

Konspirationsteoretikerne hævder, at især fundet af kemiske svovlprocesser i ruinerne fra de sammenstyrtede bygninger er meget usædvanligt og ikke kan forklares som andet end bevis på, at der har været sprængstoffer placeret i bygningerne. En af de substanser, der påstås at have været placeret på forhånd, er nanotermit, der hævdes kun at eksistere som en militært fremstillet blanding.

Højhuse i brand er aldrig kollapset

Påstanden refererer til, at det skulle være mistænkeligt, at World Trade Center 1, 2 og 7 styrtede sammen, fordi det var første gang, at stålhøjhuse var kollapset på grund af brand. Med ”mistænkeligt” er det underforstået, at en konspiration i den amerikanske regering stod bag angrebet og ikke som ellers fastslået Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda og de 19 terrorister.

Sorte bokse fundet ved World Trade Center

To redningsarbejdere i det såkaldte TRAC-team (Trauma Response Assistance for Children), Nicholas DeMasi og Mike Bellone, hævder, at de hjalp FBI-agenter med at finde og redde tre af de fire sorte bokse fra flyene, der fløj ind i World Trade Center 1 og 2. Det påstås, at FBI efterfølgende forlod stedet med boksene. Fundene skete efter sigende den 3. oktober 2001.

Vi stiller bare spørgsmål

De folk, der mener, at 9/11-terrorangrebene i virkeligheden var planlagt af en konspiration i den amerikanske regering, forsvarer ofte sig selv med bemærkningen ”vi stiller bare spørgsmål” underforstået, at det i sig selv dels er uskyldigt og blot et udtryk for en sund skepsis og dels frikender dem selv fra at komme med plausible modforklaringer.

Passet i ruinerne

Et pas, tilhørende en af de terrorister, der var ombord på Flight 11, Satam al-Suqami, blev fundet lige før WTC 2 (Sydtårnet) kollapsede, og afleveret til en kriminalassistent fra New Yorks politi. Det hævdes, at det er helt usandsynligt, at passet kan “overleve” ødelæggelserne, da Flight 11 ramte WTC 1 (Nordtårnet). Derfor må det være plantet efterfølgende, af den hemmelige konspiration, som Sandhedsbevægelsen hævder i virkeligheden stod bag terrorangrebet den 11. september 2001.

En af passagererne så en pistol

Påstanden antyder, at den officielle forklaring er forkert, fordi den officielle forklaring siger, at terroristerne brugte hobbyknive. Den officielle forklaring skulle altså forsøge at skjule, at det ikke var utrænede al-Qaeda-folk, men trænede folk, der stod for kapringen.

Flight 93 blev bortført

Påstanden tager udgangspunkt i en kort artikel fra den 11. september 2001 omkring middagstid. Borgmesteren i Cleveland, Ohio, Michael R. White, blev citeret for at sige, at en Boeing 767 fra Boston var nødlandet i Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, fordi man troede, at der var en bombe ombord.

Flight 93 blev skudt ned

Påstanden om, at Flight 93 blev skudt ned, er fremkommet ud fra, at man har fundet vragrester fra flyet op til 12 kilometer fra nedstyrtningsstedet. Blandt andet lå en flymotor, der vejede et ton cirka 800 meter fra nedstyrtningsstedet. Påstanden underbygges med argumentet om, at nedstyrtningsstedet ikke ligner et flyulykkested. Der er for få og for små vragrester. Man henviser til, at der ved andre, selv voldsomme flystyrt, er tydeligt genkendelige flydele på nedstyrtningsstedet.

Der var to fly, men tre bygninger, der kollapsede

Det er en kongstanke i Sandhedsbevægelsen, at tårnene ikke kollapsede på grund af flyene og de efterfølgende brande. Det postuleres, at tårnenes kollaps udviste alle tegn på kontrolleret sprængning, hvor nedrivningseksperter havde anbragt sprængladninger strategisk i bygningen for derefter i et nu at sprænge bygningerne, så de anrettede mindst mulig skade på omgivelserne.

Larry Silverstein begik forsikringssvindel

Påstanden hænger sammen med en anden påstand, nemlig at selvsamme Larry Silverstein beordrede, at World Trade Center 7 skulle sprænges for at opnå økonomisk vinding gennem forsikringssvindel. Forsikringserstatningen hævdes at være 5,4 milliarder dollar.

Røgen fra World Trade Center 7 kom fra World Trade Center 5

I timerne efter World Trade Center 1 og 2s kollaps observerede man en kraftig røgudvikling fra World Trade Center 7. Eftersom det påstås, at bygningen ikke brændte voldsomt, forklares røgen med, at vinden kommer ind fra nordlig retning, men trækker røgen fra det brændende World Trade Center 5 op om World Trade Center 7.

Poul Nyrup Rasmussen vidste, at det ville ske

Påstanden bruges til at underbygge konspirationsteorien om, at magtfulde mennesker på forhånd vidste, at terrorangrebet den 11. september 2001 ville finde sted, og at World Trade Center 1, 2 og 7 ville kollapse, idet der ifølge konspirationsteoretikerne var anbragt mange tons nanotermit og sprængstoffer i bygningerne.

Strømafbrydelse skjulte minering med sprængstof

Påstanden peger på, at en konspiration skulle have fingeret en omfattende strømafbrydelse for at kunne få anledning til at sende en masse folk ind i bygningen og minere den med sprængstof, uden at det blev opdaget.

Dansende israelere vidste, at terrorangrebet ville ske

Fem mænd af mellemøstligt udseende blev set juble på toppen af en varevogn, mens de filmede hændelsen. De blev anholdt, men senere frigivet. På israelsk TV udtalte de, at de kun var der for at filme begivenheden. Påstanden bruges til at argumentere for, at den israelske sikkerhedstjeneste Mossad vidste, at terrorangrebet ville finde sted.

Larry Silverstein gav ordre til nedrivning

Ejeren af World Trade Center 7, Larry Silverstein, skulle i et tv-program om terrorangrebet have indrømmet, enten ved fortalelse eller bevidst for åben skærm, at World Trade Center 7 var mineret, at han vidste det, og at han gav ordre til, at bygningen skulle sprænges i luften.

Der blev spekuleret økonomisk i katastrofen

Påstanden skal underbygge konspirationteoretikernes overordnede påstand om en verdensomspændende hemmelig organisation, der ikke kun planlægger og udfører terrorangreb og krige, men også profiterer på dem.

Der blev advaret om et angreb, uden at Bush reagerede

Påstanden bruges til at underbygge konspirationsteorien om, at terrorangrebet den 11. september 2001 ikke var planlagt og udført af islamiske terrorister, men af en regeringskonspiration blandt andet bestående af George W. Bush, Dick Cheney og andre magtfulde mennesker og ofte hemmelige organisationer.

Vulkanlignende støvskyer

Påstanden kan hentyde til, at støvskyerne fra det kollapsende World Trade Center skulle være et tegn på, at bygningerne var mineret med sprængstof. Påstanden kan også hentyde til, at støvskyerne skulle være så varme, at de var pyroklastiske skyer.

Stålsektioner flyver vandret med over 180 km/t

Påstanden antyder, at World Trade Center 1 og 2 ikke kollapsede som følge af brand og strukturelle skader fra kollisionen med de kaprede passagerfly, men at der var placeret sprængstof i begge bygninger, der bevidst blev detoneret for at få bygningerne til at styrte i grus. At stålsektioner bliver kastet med enorm kraft til siderne skulle således være bevis på, hvor kraftigt dette sprængstof var.

Termit fundet i støvet fra World Trade Center

Påstanden bygger oprindelig på en videooptagelse af sydtårnet, kort før det kollapsede, hvor man kunne se et rødglødende materiale løbe ud af bygningen. Dette blev meget hurtigt tolket af konspirationsteoretikere med Steven Jones i spidsen som værende forårsaget af termit, der var antændt. Det blev påstået, at materialet skulle være smeltet jern/stål, der løb ud af bygningen.

Pludseligt kollaps

Påstanden, der stammer fra en løbeseddel uddelt af den danske Sandhedsbevægelse, antyder, at World Trade Center 1, 2 og 7s kollaps skete pludseligt og helt overraskende. Dette skulle være bevis på, at bygningerne var mineret med sprængstof, som blev detoneret og fik bygningerne til at styrte sammen.

Frit fald og symmetrisk kollaps

Påstanden antyder, dels at fritfaldshastighed og symmetri skulle være tegn på kontrolleret nedrivning, og dels at bygningerne kunne modstå, at visse etager brød sammen som følge af brand, og at årsagen til, at hver enkelt bygning styrtede helt sammen, derfor må være, at de blev udsat for en kontrolleret nedrivning.

Osama bin Laden var ikke eftersøgt af FBI for 9/11

Påstanden huserede før Osama bin Laden blev likvideret den 2. maj 2011 af amerikanske elitestyrker. Konspirationsteoretikere mente, at eftersom FBI ikke specifikt på efterlysningsplakaten skrev, at Osama bin Laden var eftersøgt for terrorangrebet den 11. september 2001, var det ensbetydende med, at Osama bin Laden ikke havde noget med angrebet at gøre.