100 tons, that’s quite a lot, isn’t it?

Interviews & lectures

On March 3, 2015, 911facts.dk interviewed physicist Per Hedegaard about his involvement in the court case filed by Niels Harrit against Danish newspaper Weekendavisen. A U.S. website had claimed that Per Hedegaard had changed his mind and would testify in support of...

Analysis: "The Official Video: ReThink911 September 2013"

Methods

In July 2013 the umbrella organization ReThink911.org0 which comprises of a number of groups within the Truth Movement a video asking for financial support for an information campaign. The goal is to get the public to realize that the official explanation of the...

Danish physicist supports Niels Harrit

Epilogue

Claim The Danish physicist Per Hedegaard supports Harrit’s views.0. Background In the time leading up to Niels Harrit’s libel trial in the High Court, a claim emerged that the former colleague of Harrit’s, physicist Per Hedegaard, had changed his...

Donald Rumsfeld denies the existence of WTC 7

WTC 7 collapses

Claim Donald Rumsfeld denies the existence of WTC 70. Background The claim is intended to support a central claim, namely that the World Trade Center 7 was destroyed by a controlled demolition. The claim is made by Nick Mehlsen, a member of the Danish Truth Movement,...

Ferrous spheres can only be due to thermite reaction

WTC 1 collapses, WTC 2 collapses, WTC 7 collapses

Claim The claim is made by Thomas Nørgaard, physics teacher at Nørre Gymnasium, Copenhagen, on 911facts.dk’s Facebook page1: “In Harrit et al’s article ‘Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center...

Freefall and symmetrical collapse

WTC 1 collapses, WTC 2 collapses, WTC 7 collapses

Claim Collapse at near-freefall speed, symmetrical, right down through the building’s resistance0. Background It is unclear if the claim is about the World Trade Center 1, 2 or 7 but in this article, it will be treated as if it covers all three buildings. The...

Heavy rain points to nano-thermite

Epilogue, WTC 1 collapses, WTC 2 collapses, WTC 7 collapses

Claim There was heavy rain for six days after the terror attack0. Background The claim, made by e.g. Niels Harrit0, is used to support a central claim, namely that huge quantities of explosives and top secret military-developed nanothermite were placed in the World...

NIST left out FEMA’s conclusion of melted steel

WTC 1 collapses, WTC 2 collapses, WTC 7 collapses

Claim In their report of the World Trade Center 7, NIST left out the evidence of melted steel that FEMA’s report described0. Background The claim stems from the preview of “Solving The Mysteries of WTC 7”, a movie produced in 2011 by one of the Truth...

Pulverized concrete and fragmented steel

WTC 1 collapses, WTC 2 collapses

Claim Instantaneous pulverization of concrete and fragmentation of steel in transportable lengths before hitting the ground0. Background The claim can be found on a flyer handed out by the Danish Truth Movement i11time.dk and points to the World Trade Center 1, 2, and...

Steel sections fly horizontally with more than 180 km/h

WTC 1 collapses, WTC 2 collapses

Påstand Steel sections, weighing tons, fly circa 150 meters horizontally with a velocity of more than 180 km/h.0 A similar claim may also be found on NielsHarrit.org: Photo of 4 ton steel ejected 600 feet (3628 kg flew horizontally 182 meters) from the World Trade...

There were two planes, but three buildings that collapsed

WTC 1 collapses, WTC 1 hit, WTC 2 collapses, WTC 2 hit, WTC 7 collapses

Claim Two planes cannot possibly make three buildings collapse, if only two of the buildings are hit by the planes0. Background The claim is used to support the claim that the Twin Towers did not collapse due to the damage caused by the planes, and the subsequent...

Thermite found in the dust from the World Trade Center

WTC 1 collapses, WTC 2 collapses, WTC 7 collapses

Claim Thermite (explosive) has been found in the dust and steel debris0. Background The claim stems from a video clip by the World Trade Center 2 shortly before the building collapses. Glowing material can be seen coming out of the building. This was quickly seen by...

The Twin Towers could withstand passenger planes

WTC 1 hit, WTC 2 hit

Claim World Trade Center 1 and 2, also known as the Twin Towers, were designed to withstand the impact of modern passenger planes0. Background If the Twin Towers could withstand an impact from a Boeing plane, the reason for the collapse of the buildings must be that...

The World Trade Center 7 was not significantly damaged

WTC 7 collapses

Claim The claim is made, among others, by the Danish retired chemistry professor Niels Harrit: “Basically nothing happened to Building 7 when the north tower collapsed.” 0 Background The claim is used to support another claim, namely that the World Trade...

Tons of melted metal at Ground Zero

WTC 1 collapses, WTC 2 collapses, WTC 7 collapses

Claim The claim takes on several forms: “Prevalence of several tons of melted metal under all 3 buildings”0. “And that explains why there were still lakes of melted iron in the ruins of the towers many weeks later”1. Background The claim posits...

Volcanic-like dust clouds

WTC 1 collapses, WTC 2 collapses

Claim Formation of huge hot volcanic-like dust clouds0. Background It is unclear what the claim covers since dust clouds can look like anything depending on imagination. Photos from the World Trade Center, during the attackThe claim could mean that the dust clouds...